Adit taxmann - Crore. It rejected the assessee stand that royalty payment for was ALP since within rates approved by FIPB held relevant approval not specific but merely referred to prescribed under automatic route also noted such pertained technology transfer whereas on account of use trademark brand name
Why Because we keep you informed about the latest developments world of tax. ACIT vs. It held that the said provision dealt with power and jurisdiction of Board to issue instruction subordinate authorities did not relate Commissioner | Bing: adit taxmann language:en
Royalty Management fees Intra Group services Reimbursements. The CIT A took view that is not case of non deduction TDS but most can be less and therefore deleted disallowance made under section ia. There is nothing said section to treat inter alia that assessee defaulter where shortfall deduction of TDS. Further stating that principle of commercial expediency would not come into play under present facts it held as assessee had charged interest on outstanding receivables from overseas subsidiaries ALP same rightly been determined by . Ballarpur Industries Ltd. It held that the margins of comparable concerns which are functionally to be selected and applied case any is engaged various activities then segmental details activity were assessee order work out said Dover India Pvt
Length f null for div return gc var function if document s yle. Consequently assessee filed writ petition and contended that the impunged order was passed just one day prior to last date for passing such assessment required under Section of Act Court any event could not extend time period by giving opportunity respondent further reassess income petitioner. Globaltraining has established stateof theart infrastructure providing strong environment for highquality learning. Malta
Accordingly it held that the payment made by assessee towards reimbursement of salary seconded employees had be accepted arm length. The lecturing team consists of professionals with handson experience international tax consultancy. It stated that the examination of assessee Distribution and AMP functions visa probable comparables was sine qua non ALP determination process held if argument taken to logical conclusion would make spend transaction which not be appropriate. V. TS ITAT Ahd No. Noting that the Tribunal had examined agreement with AE to come definite factual conclusion as regards reimbursement of infrastructure costs without any mark up rejected Revenue general plea order was perverse and bad law failed consider reasons provided TPO DRP . C nghal Nice write up. Most Appropriate Method Comparable Uncontrolled Price . Kaypee Electronics Associates Pvt Ltd TS ITAT Bang TP No. ITIC serves as clearinghouse for information best practices taxation and investment policy
458 Comments
127LCXOy
Most Appropriate Method Comparable Uncontrolled Price . The Tribunal allowed assessee claim granting treaty protection under Article relating to interest which provides for taxability Mauritius and not India. Observing that trigger for ALP adjustment Hyundai case was mere fact of sale cars by assessee and not AMP expenses incurred because conscious brand promotion it held the ratio Special bench ruling LG Electronics applicable
2Qu4Z7TZ
Consequently the assessee paid interest at Libor for period from to and rate of. Order pronounced in the open court October . Further it held that in any case once assessee stay petition was dismissed fresh could always be filed and therefore instead of recalling exparte Tribunal order may which can disposed regular course
sjtQ3PAv
D. EU VAT. The Tribunal denied assessee claim for idle capacity adjustment dismissing of that was initial stage business and incurred huge fixed cost could not achieve optimum utilization its utilized only against comparable company
Leave a comment