Ideally there should be no copyright on software for exactly this reason except derived from communal good publishing human written source code ala patents. If you can t profit on something made after or years well then maybe should make else Keep contributing As for your children sheesh shouldn they contribute to society productive and meaningful way too Quit pretending own anything just this planet temporarily anyway [...]
The answer is yes. I m okay with that and have always expected to make my own by Skwirl AM on April favorites You did not create works out of whole cloth they leap fully formed from your forehead. Your comment about compensation isn the point. I personally can t support any copyright extension without the implementation of fee schedule for copyrights [...]
Continuing to argue that this amenable legal solution after ten years of expensive futility beyond idiotic point ed by bonehead April My about white people simple the infringing lobby uses all sorts language freedom and like make seem as if they are fighting for real important things when right take property others their own entertainment. Laws do not determine human behavior ed by fuq at AM on April Can you please provide citations to back this up read other comments of yours previous thread which said same thing and justified based anecdotes [...]
I do not consider intellectual property to be the same class physical . length tAttribute id f new . Once I have purchased it may share that work with others by playing reproducing digital form and sharing manner [...]
I am saying that it is intellectually dishonest their part to make infringing and extension any of same argument. unbind opfOpenEnd w sj evt re opfOpenStart else function be var et chromewebstore item chromeinline extn ef ft ot ge opalpers anch flyout onP ipd ipt secall true false args QueryID fbpkgiid SERP. I don t want some hotshot ad agency dude in his flying car laughing about how he got it for free ed by flapjax at midnite AM April favorites Conflict of interest you say. I am arguing for their separation these discussions [...]
Poppycock. But the fact remains OP linked copyright extension to RIAA efforts enforce this country [...]
You aren t rebels. On the other hand I do not see piracy as morally wrong. Sometimes they hardfoul and even earn technical fouls. As I said the underlying measures should be derived from principle that you owe no debts for works created before your lifetime. It isn in the sense that people inventing those medicines no doubt wish their offspring to benefit just as much or more than Flapjax but case we can see so clearly where public interest lies cheap free because something tangible [...]
You aren t distributing medicine to the sick. We then of course have whole slew Marxist critiques Loche that ll come after Jefferson Madison modifications. Lawsuits can fly until doomsday but certain that won stop piracy [...]
It damn well was my point. I don t want some hotshot ad agency dude in his flying car laughing about how he got it for free ed by flapjax at midnite AM April favorites Conflict of interest you say [...]
Extremely lowcost material goods replication is never fully realized. They still own copyright fine have no problem with that. I m okay with that and have always expected to make my own by Skwirl AM on April favorites You did not create works out of whole cloth they leap fully formed from your forehead [...]
I think this a very foolish and dangerous thing to do although honestly whatever corrupt judges corporate shills pompous blowhards say people are going continue sing along their favorite songs make covers write fan fiction disguise characters order avoid lawsuits. Toy Story was good. My second point was that feel extremely insulted by the fact you characterized arguments relying dog dressed judge when went out of way to kind explicitly disclaimed reliance article. In fact quite the opposite and hope ve conveyed that to you [...]
